The webinar “Value-Added Services vs. Prohibited Beneficiary Inducement: When is the line crossed?” will be held Tuesday, June 4, from 2:30–4 p.m. ET. It is perfectly acceptable for a DME provider to provide services to its patients that the provider's competitors do not. This is good business. These are classified as value-added services. On the other hand, when a provider offers "something of value" to induce a Medicare beneficiary to buy something from the provider (as opposed to buying something from the provider's competitor), then this may result in a prohibited inducement in violation of the beneficiary inducement statute and the Medicare anti-kickback statute. Sign up now by clicking here for this webinar with Jeffrey S. Baird, Esq., Brown & Fortunato, P.C.
Monday, June 3, 2013