Based on the DME MAC's review of documentation received, the following were the two primary reasons for denial:
by Sarah Hanna

In August, Jurisdiction A released the results of a prepayment
review of claims for HCPCS codes A4623 (Tracheostomy, Inner
Cannula) and A4629 (Tracheostomy Care Kit for Established
Patients). According to RemitData, the national average denial rate
was 25.5 percent for A4623 and 6.7 percent for A4629. However, when
we look at what is truly required, many of the claims that were
paid might have been denied if they had been part of a prepayment
review such as the one conducted in Jurisdiction A.

The review was initiated due to the results of the quarterly
review of dollars-allowed trends that indicated high volume claims
for these two codes. The review involved a prepayment complex
medical review of 100 claims submitted by 42 suppliers, of which 35
claims were allowed as billed and 65 were denied, resulting in a
claim denial rate of 65 percent.

Based on the DME MAC's review of documentation received, the
following were the two primary reasons for denial:

Service determined to be medically unnecessary (27%):

No MD orders

  • No medical records from ordering physician(s); other pertinent
    documentation that would support the medical necessity of the
    item(s) billed

  • No other substantiating documentation (e.g., delivery tickets
    (no date), invoice including manufacturer's name and model
    numbers

  • Duplicate submission

  • Service denied as duplicate, previously considered

  • Requested medical documentation not received (38%):

    Service denied as requested documentation not received (17 of 42
    suppliers did not submit medical records as requested).

    The most common problem was that suppliers did not respond to
    requests for medical records. Of the services denied as not
    medically necessary, there were missing or incomplete records such
    as no orders on record; no medical record that contained
    information about the items used and/or the underlying medical
    condition/documentation that would support the medical necessity;
    and missing delivery tickets.

    Remember, documentation must be available to the DME MAC upon
    request. Suppliers should be aware of the documentation
    requirements provided in the DME MAC's Supplier Manual.

    It is your responsibility to provide sufficient documentation to
    support the medical necessity of the items you bill to the DME MAC.
    It is recommended that you maintain these records on file so that
    they can be made available if your DME MAC requests them for
    specific reviews.

    If you receive a documentation request for any product you are
    billing, you must respond to those requests in a timely manner upon
    notification from the DME MAC.

    Based on analysis of 5,217,235 Medicare claims processed for
    RemitDATA customers during the second quarter of 2010. Source:
    RemitDATA, 866/885-2974, www.remitdata.com

    Read more Working Down Denials
    columns.

    Sarah Hanna is a reimbursement consultant and vice president
    of ECS Billing
    & Consulting
    , Tiffin, Ohio, and specializes in proper
    billing protocols, Medicare coverage guidelines and billing office
    procedures. You can reach her at 419/448-5332 or sarahhanna@bright.net.